Washington (CNN)President
Barack Obama sought to highlight the United States' commitment to the
28-nation NATO alliance Monday, even as the leading Republican in the
race to replace him has deemed the coalition "obsolete."
Obama
met in the Oval Office alongside NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg for more than an hour to discuss progress in the battle
against ISIS and the response to last month's terror attack in Brussels,
where NATO is headquartered.
While
he didn't respond to questions shouted by the press about Donald
Trump's derision of NATO, Obama did describe the alliance as intrinsic
to American defense.
"NATO
continues to be the lynchpin, the cornerstone, of our collective defense
and U.S. security policy," Obama said. "It is because of the strength
of NATO and the transatlantic partnership -- this transatlantic alliance
-- that I'm confident that despite these choppy waters we will continue
to be able to underscore and underwrite the peace and security and
prosperity that has been the hallmark of the transatlantic relationship
for so many decades."
U.S.
officials see NATO as an essential player in the campaign against the
terror group since it provides channels of command and communication
between the United States and its European allies, though its
traditional focus has been as a military alliance that provides for
mutual defense stemming from the Cold War.
After
the meeting, Obama said the leaders discussed ways to prevent ISIS from
obtaining a foothold in Libya by supporting a stabilizing government
there.
Obama and Stoltenberg also consulted on Ukraine, parts of which have been seized by Russian-aligned forces.
NATO
has typically enjoyed broad -- if sometimes begrudging -- support from
both Democrats and Republicans, who have regarded the grouping of
European and North American countries as an ironclad facet of American
foreign policy, though perhaps one overly reliant on American resources.
Obama
has pressed European nations -- including France, Belgium and the
United Kingdom -- to ramp up their military and financial support for
the NATO alliance, which has long relied on significant contributions
from the United States to maintain its mission of protecting member
states from outside aggression.
Recent terror attacks in Paris and
Brussels by ISIS-trained militants, paired with Russian activity in
Eastern Europe, have led to greater commitments from some countries. The
U.S. has also increased troop rotations through Eastern Europe as a
display of support for NATO members in the region, nervous at signs of
Russian territorial aggression.
But
to GOP front-runner Trump, European NATO countries are falling far
short, and he has taken to disparaging the organization on the campaign
trail.
In Wisconsin this weekend,
Trump argued that many of NATO's member states weren't paying their
"fair share" for the protections that NATO affords.
"That
means we are protecting them and they are getting all sorts of military
protection and other things, and they're ripping off the United States,
and they're ripping you off," Trump said at a rally in Racine. "I don't
want to do that. Either they pay up, including the past deficiencies,
or they have to get out. And if it breaks up NATO, it breaks up NATO."
That
sentiment drew criticism from Trump's GOP rivals, who argued for a more
muscular alliance to fend off threats both from ISIS and Russian
President Vladimir Putin.
"NATO has
to be stronger not only vis-Ã -vis Putin and what could happen over
there in Central and Eastern Europe, but we want our allies to share
intelligence with us," Ohio Gov. John Kasich said in March.
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz dismissed Trump's comments on NATO as "hopelessly naïve."
"What
Donald Trump is saying is that he would unilaterally surrender to
Russia and Putin, give Putin a massive foreign policy victory by
breaking NATO and abandoning Europe," Cruz said.
White
House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that Obama's Oval Office
meeting with Stoltenberg had been "on the books long before Mr. Trump's
ill-advised comments" about NATO.
Trump's
argument that member nations don't pay into NATO's coffers, however, is
a persistent knock on the alliance. Obama himself made direct calls for
fellow leaders to increase their military spending during the last NATO
summit, held in Wales in 2014.
Despite
that pressure, however, only five of the 28 nations in NATO have met
the benchmark of spending 2% of their gross domestic products on
defense, according to NATO calculation, even as many increase their
military budgets.
Obama is likely to press that issue again when he travels to Poland in July for his final NATO summit as commander in chief.
On
Monday, Stoltenberg said he would continue to make that case to member
nations that in times of increased security pressures, investing in
military spending is essential.
"NATO is as important as ever, because NATO has been able to adapt to a more dangerous world," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment